Skip to main content

When exercise really is the best medicine


In 1997 a study was published in “Blood”, arguably the most respected medical journal on blood cancers on planet earth.  The study was about the effect of exercise on treatment related fatigue after a type of bone marrow transplant called a peripheral blood stem cell transplant.  The study peaked my interest, not just because of the positive benefits of exercise on reducing fatigue, but because it also showed a benefit in other somewhat more unexpected areas.  It also reduced the length of time a patient’s white blood cell count is low after transplant, the severity of diarrhoea and the severity of pain.  Of these the one that interested me most at the time, was the effect on the white blood cell count.  The white cells are the part of your blood system which fight infection; without them the body is more prone to getting nasty bugs and less able to fight them off.

So, what was so interesting about this finding?  In the early 80’s a medication, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), which reduced the length of time a patient’s white blood cell count was low after chemotherapy, was discovered and developed right here in Australia.  Clinical use of G-CSF reduced the likelihood of a dangerous infections in susceptible patients.  It was a magnificent achievement, and history has proven that it has been one of the most significant advances in the supportive care of cancer patients in our life-time.

Now back to the 1997 study (you’ve got to stay with me on this one 😊).  Although this was a small study, the magnitude of the effect of exercise on improving white cell counts was about the same as G-CSF.  Yet no one in the hospitals I worked in got excited and started “prescribing” exercise.  I’ve always felt that this was a large oversight by traditional medicine.

During the time in-between 1997 and now, however, a growing body of information and research from the non-traditional or non-western medicine areas has been building.  Yesterday on my Facebook feed a post by Chandrika Gibson of the Suyra Health-Yoga Studio popped up.  It was a review which combined the results on all the available published studies on exercise and other non-pharmaceutical interventions for cancer-related fatigue in patients during or after cancer treatment.

They looked at 112 studies reporting on 13 different activities which included relaxation, massage, cognitive behavioural therapy alone or combined with physical activity, resistance training, aerobic exercise, yoga, healing touch, dance, music and Tai-Chi.

The good news was that many of the above activities improved cancer-related fatigue.  They found:
  • During cancer treatment the most useful activities were relaxation, massage, cognitive behavioural therapy combined with physical activity, resistance training, aerobic activity and yoga; and
  • After cancer treatment had finished the most useful activities were yoga, cognitive behavioural therapy alone or combined with physical therapy, tai-chi, resistance training and aerobic exercise. 

More and more specialists are now recommending various integrative oncology practises.  Integrative oncology is a term used to describe the use of mind and body practices, natural products, and/or lifestyle modifications from different traditions alongside conventional cancer treatments.  Importantly like the above recently published study integrative oncology is based on evidence to support the effectiveness of the activity.


For too long, however, health services have ignored the psychological and physical impacts of going to hospital for treatment.  So many of our patients have said that they found attending hospitals for treatment confronting, stressful and chaotic.  They say that sitting around waiting for treatment, spending most of the day in a busy hospital does nothing to improve their physical or their mental status.  What they say that want and need is to be able to live a “normal” active life with peace and calm.  chemo@home offers patients the choice of having their treatment in the most relaxing, calm environment possible – the patient’s own home. And with the growing body of research mounting on the benefits of integrative medicine AND the benefits of home chemotherapy, the future of cancer care is likely to be very different to what it has been in the past.  It will be fascinating to see maybe some more unexpected benefits in both areas!


Julie

Read more on integrative oncology at https://integrativeonc.org/
Read more about the research done by chemo@home at http://chemoathome.com.au/research/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is chemo in the home a “pink batts disaster” in the making?

There are few of us who escaped the news coverage of what happened when the Australian  government wanted to boost the economy back in 2009, by funding the installation of “pink batts” into homes. Tragically, four young men died, from what was found to be a lack of oversight by the government resulting in massive system failures.  Simply put, the government provided the money, but did not ensure that there was the appropriate legislation, regulation or training available to make it safe.  And where there is money to be made, there will always be some who will want to profit from it.  Some of these people will have no regard for the safety of the product they are supplying, some will be ignorant of what is needed to make it safe.  The result is the same. When people ask me, “is giving chemo in the home safe?”, I find it difficult to answer.  To be honest the answer is both yes and no. I have worked managing a “home chemo” service for just under 20 years.  I’ve developed a

So, you want a second opinion??

Recently I had an abnormal test result come back.   I’ll withhold the details, so those who are squeamish don’t stop reading.   Suffice to say it is a test that only women need to have done, it is done as an early detection test for cancer, and no woman enjoys it. The abnormal result is not one you want, and means you need further tests to confirm the findings, to work out if any treatment is needed and importantly to make sure there is no cancer.   So, my fabulous GP, Penny, did a referral and off I toddled to a surgeon for more tests. In the surgeon’s office the additional tests undertaken where inconclusive, that is, there was nothing bad found but he also couldn’t see all the bits he needed to be able to see to say that everything was definitely OK.   His recommendation at this stage was a very reasonable one, and one that many surgeons in the same position would have given.   The recommendation was to do a “biopsy’ and send it off to the lab for further analysis.   To ca