Skip to main content

So, you want a second opinion??


Recently I had an abnormal test result come back.  I’ll withhold the details, so those who are squeamish don’t stop reading.  Suffice to say it is a test that only women need to have done, it is done as an early detection test for cancer, and no woman enjoys it.

The abnormal result is not one you want, and means you need further tests to confirm the findings, to work out if any treatment is needed and importantly to make sure there is no cancer.  So, my fabulous GP, Penny, did a referral and off I toddled to a surgeon for more tests.

In the surgeon’s office the additional tests undertaken where inconclusive, that is, there was nothing bad found but he also couldn’t see all the bits he needed to be able to see to say that everything was definitely OK.  His recommendation at this stage was a very reasonable one, and one that many surgeons in the same position would have given.  The recommendation was to do a “biopsy’ and send it off to the lab for further analysis.  To call this recommendation a “biopsy”, somewhat underplays the procedure.  It kind of makes you think of just a little sample of tissue.  But no, this was 3-5cm long by 0.5 cm deep, bloody big “biopsy”.  That’s not a biopsy in my books, that’s removal of almost an entire organ.  It meant I needed admission to hospital, a general anaesthetic and time off to recover post procedure.

I knew the risks of the abnormal cells turning into cancer, IF they were there, and I knew I didn’t want cancer.  I therefore agreed to the procedure but made the booking date long enough in the future (6 weeks), so that I could do some research and think about my options.

From here I read around the issue.  I’m very lucky that working in this area I have access to a lot of information.  I am also fortunate that I can understand and interpret medical information.  However, the more I read, the less happy I was with the bloody big “biopsy” option.  I wanted to find the least invasive way I could to get a diagnosis BEFORE I had to have surgery, not have the surgery to get a diagnosis.  Surely, I thought, in this day and age that should be possible?

Again, I am thankful for knowing health professionals who specialise in this area, and I could make a quick phone call and pick their brains.  I got more information, and this really helped me to work out what I wanted to do.  I wanted a second opinion.

I sent an email to my amazing GP, Penny, explaining why I wasn’t comfortable with the original recommendation and asking for another referral for a second opinion from a specialist who was highly skilled in this area of medicine.  Penny did not hesitate; the referral was sent through within the hour.  There was no making me feel guilty, no questioning my thought processes, no defending the recommendations of the surgeon.

So now I am off for my second opinion.  More tests, and this surgeon, because he specialises in more difficult cases was able to see all the bits he needed to see.  Unfortunately, though, some of the bits he could see looked abnormal, so multiple biopsies were sent off to the lab.  These biopsies though were just little samples of tissue and not the bloody big “biopsy” originally recommended.  The biopsy results were not so great, and it seemed I would need to have surgery.

The interesting thing though was the surgery which was now being recommended was in a different area to the original recommendation.  This meant had I gone with the first recommendation I would have had a bloody big “biopsy” of a normal area, and the abnormal area would have been left behind….with the potential for cancer to develop.  That would not have been a great outcome in my books.

I now had a choice of having the surgery I needed in a hospital under general anaesthetic or in the clinic rooms under local anaesthetic.  Of course, I opted for the clinic rooms and local anaesthetic.  When I said “I have discharged against medical advice twice and own a home health service.  You can pretty safely assume I will do almost anything to avoid being admitted to hospital,” the surgeon laughed and laughed and asked if he could write that in my notes!

A booking was made, and I was comfortable with this decision.  A week later I am at the clinic for surgery.  However, when the surgeon goes to perform the procedure the abnormal area has disappeared.  My little old immune system had kicked in and the abnormal cells had vanished!!

Yay immune system.  Yay (reasonably) healthy eating.  Yay yin yoga. Yay meditation. Yay me.

He took some of the small kind of biopsies again anyway, just to make sure all was good, but the actual surgical procedure was cancelled. It was lucky I hadn’t opted for the hospital option instead, as by the time they worked out I didn’t need the surgical procedure I would have already been anaesthetised.

I had gone from needing a rather invasive procedure involving a bloody big “biopsy”, hospital admission and a general anaesthetic to needing NO TREATMENT!  I cannot tell you how damn ecstatic I am that I got that second opinion.  How glad I am I trusted my instincts.  How glad I am that I knew my body well.  How glad I am that my GP supported me.

I also know how lucky I am.  Not everyone has the level of access to medical information that I have.  Not everyone has the same level of understanding of health issues that I have.  Not everyone feels brave enough to ask for a second opinion. Sometimes, they are even made to feel guilty for daring to consider it.

At a time when you are worried or sick, it can be difficult to find your voice and ask for a second opinion, even if you want one.  Cancer patients find it especially difficult, as they fear that any delays may decrease their chance of survival.  But I have sat in many 100s of “team meetings” where patients treatment options are discussed.  I know that sometimes there are different opinions on what the recommended option is.  It is not always black and white, there can be a good deal of grey.

So, I encourage you to speak up, ask questions, be strong, make decisions that you and your family are comfortable with.  ASK FOR A SECOND OPINION, IF YOU FEEL YOU NEED ONE.

Lastly, big shout out to all the wonderful GPs who support their patients in getting a second opinion, especially my GP, Penny.  You rock Penny.  And another shout out to all the Specialists who see second opinion patients (because not all do).  Your sensitivity and fairness are appreciated.

Julie

Comments

  1. I am 29 years old and have been diagnosed with breast cancer, ease of treatment and a similar story, except for my first acceptance as a rejection of herbal medicine. I was not part of the Perseid movement and did not really build relationships with any of them, I just believed in their operation. I say this because it was during the use of Dr. Itua herbal medicine that I now attest that herbal medicine is real, the phytotherapy Dr. Itua heal my breast cancer which I suffered for 2 years. Dr. Itua herbal medicine is made of natural herbs, with no side effects, and easy to drink. If you have the same breast cancer or any type of human illness, including HIV / AIDS, herpes cancer,Ovarian Cancer,Pancratics cancers, bladder cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, kidney cancer, lung cancer, skin cancer, skin cancer and skin cancer.testicular Cancer, , LEUKEMIA, VIRUSES, HEPATITIS, INFERTILITY WOMEN / MAN, LOT OF LOVE, LOTTERY. ITS CONTACT EMAIL / WHATSAPP: info@drituaherbalcenter.com Or drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com/ +2348149277967

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Go Fund Me – I Don’t Want Chemo

As a woman I have breasts.  As a white, western, woman I have about a 1 in 8 chance of getting breast cancer.If I get breast cancer, I really don’t want chemotherapy, if I can avoid it.Not unless it will make a significant difference to my outcome. Until recently, knowing if this was the case, was difficult.
Rarely does a study comes out and say that chemotherapy is not needed; that it does not reduce the likelihood of the cancer coming back and does not increase survival.
But that is exactly what has happened in a large trial on breast cancer patients with hormone-receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative, axillary node–negative breast cancer, who would have until now, been given what is known as adjuvant chemotherapy.
Adjuvant chemotherapy is chemotherapy which is given after a potentially curative procedure (in the case of breast cancer this is surgery) to mop up any remaining cancer cells in the body that we can’t see. It’s a tricky business.  We’ve …

Would You Like Marijuana with Your Chemotherapy?

I am frequently asked, as a pharmacist who specialises in cancer medicine, what do I think about the use of marijuana for medical conditions?

I often reflect back to dispensing dronabinol (a synthetic THC product) for chemotherapy induced nausea and HIV related wasting syndrome, when I first started working as a pharmacist in a hospital in the early 90s.  Back then it was no big deal, the hospital pharmacy imported the medication from overseas, just like we did many other medications which were not marketed in Australia, and supplied it on a doctor’s prescription.
We didn’t stop supplying it because it was difficult to get hold of, rather it just wasn’t very useful any more.  New anti-nausea medications came on the market, and these were much more effective at controlling the nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy, and, a new class of medications known as antiretrovirals became available and these were so effective at treating HIV we thankfully were no longer seeing the devast…

When exercise really is the best medicine

In 1997 a study was published in “Blood”, arguably the most respected medical journal on blood cancers on planet earth.The study was about the effect of exercise on treatment related fatigue after a type of bone marrow transplant called a peripheral blood stem cell transplant.The study peaked my interest, not just because of the positive benefits of exercise on reducing fatigue, but because it also showed a benefit in other somewhat more unexpected areas.It also reduced the length of time a patient’s white blood cell count is low after transplant, the severity of diarrhoea and the severity of pain.Of these the one that interested me most at the time, was the effect on the white blood cell count.The white cells are the part of your blood system which fight infection; without them the body is more prone to getting nasty bugs and less able to fight them off.
So, what was so interesting about this finding?In the early 80’s a medication, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), which …