Skip to main content

Which "Hospital" Lets Your Dog Stay With You During Chemo?


When I am asked why we started chemo@home, I often talk about how when my Dad was sick, some 20 odd years ago, that there was no “@home” services but that I was lucky enough to work in a hospital where the nursing staff taught me (the pharmacist) how to give the antibiotics my Dad needed, and this allowed us to take him home over Christmas.  This was to be his last Christmas with us and I am forever grateful that he spent it with us, his family, at home, and not in a hospital.

This is absolutely true.  There are however, two other reasons that I was led down this path.  Today I’ll talk about one of these.

I've worked in a number of hospitals, both public and private, for around 25 years.  I loved everything about working in a hospital.  There is a comradery amongst the staff, one which is built on working hard, doing a difficult job under challenging circumstances, which is hard to find outside of a hospital environment.  I think, maybe, serving in the military may provide a similar feeling.

Image result for chemotherapy day unitThe thing is though, as much as I loved working in a hospital, I really dislike being a patient in a one.  I dislike the noise and chaos, I need calm.  The last time I was in hospital, I was near the “pan room”, damn that thing is noisy!  I dislike being told what to do and when.  Why exactly does my heart rate and blood pressure need to be taken at midnight, when I’m asleep?  I dislike my sleep being interrupted. Did I mention the pan room and being woken to do my heart rate and blood pressure?   I dislike hard beds. My bed at home is soooo comfortable, I’m literally in love with it. I dislike feeling that I spend 23 hours and 30 minutes of the day waiting for someone to do something that will help me to get better so I can go home.  I FEEL like this as a patient, even though I know what those hours and minutes are spent doing as a health professional.  I dislike the food, and being fed at weirdly early times.  Only my nan and pop ate dinner at 5.30pm.  I dislike that people come into my room, unannounced, and then don't say who they are or what they are doing there. That is just rude. It is also so common, that in the UK they have introduced a program called “Hello, my name is” to educate health professionals on the importance of introducing themselves.  I don’t like being apart from my family or my dog.  Having visitors in hospital feels awkward, as it’s hard for people to relax when you couldn’t swing a cat in the room and there are no chairs to sit on.  And try bringing in your dog, see what reaction that gets!

I’ve DAMA twice – that means I have “Discharged Against Medical Advise”. TWICE.  Once after my son was born, and once after a minor medical procedure.  The hospital staff are required to make you sign a form to clear the hospital of any legal liability should something go wrong because you left early.  The thing is, I made a conscious decision to leave, knowing the risks and benefits, because I knew my body, because I was sensible, because I had numerous family and friends who were health professionals to call on and I knew what to do IF there were any problems.  But I was treated like a number, like I had no brain, no free will, and I was given no choice.

Hospitals and Day-Units are fabulous places, absolutely needed, and they are filled with dedicated staff, who all work incredibly hard to provide great care.  But everything must work to their schedule, like the military, rules are there to be followed, and patients often feel like just another cog in a huge machine. Every time I hear about more chairs being added to a chemotherapy day-unit or a new one being built, I cringe just a little at the lost opportunity to do things differently.  They are hiddeously expensive, like 10s of millions of dollars expensive.  And no matter how much money is spent on design, how nice the decor, they still look like rows or pods of chairs, in a hospital clinic.  They are still noisy.  They are still confronting.  You still have no privacy. And you are still told where to sit and what to do.

For me there is no better reward for providing a service that enables people to have hospital level treatment @home, than reading some of the beautiful feed-back we receive from our patients and their families:

You have made this horrendous journey a little less scary every time you visit our home.  You calm us, you support us and you explain so much that we find so confusing and confronting.  I can’t thank you enough.  I only wish everywhere had the same wonderful service that you provide.  Thank you so much xxxx

Having my treatment for multiple sclerosis at home today was as easy as ever, especially grateful as it is so hot outside. Thank you xx

Our baby was able to sleep in the comfort of his own room while I sat on the couch and my husband held my hand as the chemo was being administered.

For me, having chemo@home, it’s on my terms…that one choice of where you can have it, it’s empowering. 

It’s this that inspires me, my business partner Lorna, and our whole chemo@home team.  Letting people live their lives as fully as possible during a difficult time.  Giving them a sense of calm.  Giving them a sense of control.  Giving them CHOICE.

Having treatment at home isn’t available everywhere, it’s not suitable for all treatments and it’s not for some people.  But now that chemo@home is an option, it should be a offered to those who, when appropriate, would choose it. 

If this is you, and you want chemo@home to give your treatment at home, ask for it.  If you’re told no, ask why? Let us know what the response is.

Julie


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is chemo in the home a “pink batts disaster” in the making?

There are few of us who escaped the news coverage of what happened when the Australian  government wanted to boost the economy back in 2009, by funding the installation of “pink batts” into homes. Tragically, four young men died, from what was found to be a lack of oversight by the government resulting in massive system failures.  Simply put, the government provided the money, but did not ensure that there was the appropriate legislation, regulation or training available to make it safe.  And where there is money to be made, there will always be some who will want to profit from it.  Some of these people will have no regard for the safety of the product they are supplying, some will be ignorant of what is needed to make it safe.  The result is the same. When people ask me, “is giving chemo in the home safe?”, I find it difficult to answer.  To be honest the answer is both yes and no. I have worked managing a “home chemo” service for just unde...

So, you want a second opinion??

Recently I had an abnormal test result come back.   I’ll withhold the details, so those who are squeamish don’t stop reading.   Suffice to say it is a test that only women need to have done, it is done as an early detection test for cancer, and no woman enjoys it. The abnormal result is not one you want, and means you need further tests to confirm the findings, to work out if any treatment is needed and importantly to make sure there is no cancer.   So, my fabulous GP, Penny, did a referral and off I toddled to a surgeon for more tests. In the surgeon’s office the additional tests undertaken where inconclusive, that is, there was nothing bad found but he also couldn’t see all the bits he needed to be able to see to say that everything was definitely OK.   His recommendation at this stage was a very reasonable one, and one that many surgeons in the same position would have given.   The recommendation was to do a “biopsy’ and send it off to the lab for f...

In whose best interests?

Recent media reports have highlighted the somewhat complex and hidden costs associated with health care.   The Four Corners report “Mind the Gap” focused on out-of-pocket expenses and hidden fees from surgeons.   Whilst the ABC medical report on “Secret Pacemaker Payments Boosting Private Hospital Coffers” focused on the hidden rebates hospitals receive for using various medical devices. The two issues are separate, but very much related.  Both point to the lack of transparency of financial interactions between specialists, hospitals and a variety of other stakeholders in the health care market. The first media report highlighted the issue around “informed financial consent”.   It is mandatory for all patients receiving care from a specialist in a private hospital to sign a document stating that they agree to the charges related to the procedure or care for which they are being admitted.   But how “informed” is the financial consent?   At a vulnera...