Skip to main content

Would You Like Marijuana with Your Chemotherapy?

I am frequently asked, as a pharmacist who specialises in cancer medicine, what do I think about the use of marijuana for medical conditions?

I often reflect back to dispensing dronabinol (a synthetic THC product) for chemotherapy induced nausea and HIV related wasting syndrome, when I first started working as a pharmacist in a hospital in the early 90s.  Back then it was no big deal, the hospital pharmacy imported the medication from overseas, just like we did many other medications which were not marketed in Australia, and supplied it on a doctor’s prescription.

We didn’t stop supplying it because it was difficult to get hold of, rather it just wasn’t very useful any more.  New anti-nausea medications came on the market, and these were much more effective at controlling the nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy, and, a new class of medications known as antiretrovirals became available and these were so effective at treating HIV we thankfully were no longer seeing the devastating effects of the disease.

So, as the current debate over the use of marijuana for medical conditions rages and health professional seem pitted against consumers with politicians waging in (mostly unhelpfully) on the subject, what are the issues?  Notwithstanding the difficulties in completing all the paperwork and processes necessary to prescribe marijuana, the problems, as I see it, are as follows:
  • Firstly, and unfortunately, the debate over the use of marijuana is often hijacked by “conspiracy theorists”.  Those who think that big pharma has the cure for cancer and is just not telling us, and that we just get a kick out of poisoning people with cancer drugs because it keeps us in business.  These people will frequently make claims that marijuana cures cancer.  It is at this stage I like to point out that cancer is not one disease, it is hundreds of different diseases, with a couple of hundred different treatment options, and we DO, in fact, cure a number of cancers already.  Just ask ex-Australian cricketer, Simon O’Donnell, musician, Delta Goodrem and even the disgraced cyclist, Lance Armstrong.
  • Secondly, well-meaning patients (and patient advocates) will stand up and say how effective marijuana has been at treating their condition, without acknowledging the fact that they have also used or are currently still on conventional medication. This does not mean the marijuana they are using is not having a therapeutic effect, but it does make health professionals sceptical of such claims.
  • Thirdly, health professionals just don’t know how to use it properly, YET.  Health professionals are science nerds.  When giving a medication, they want to understand what diseases or symptoms it is useful in treating, what the medication does and what the effective dose is.  Much of this information is unclear at present.
  • Fourthly, and particularly in the absence of above, health professionals take comfort in discussing unfamiliar issues with a colleague who has experience in the area.  This is not specific to marijuana, they do it for most things – uncommon conditions, new medications, or a new kind of diagnostic test.  A chat with a colleague is one of the most common forms of informal learning.  Unfortunately, there are very few health professionals with experience in the use of marijuana to chat to.
  • Lastly, and rather disappointingly I think, some of the people providing educational offerings on the use of marijuana do not focus on points three and four, instead they discuss how safe it is compared to say alcohol, or they use terms in their presentations like “flying high”.  It is not helpful to refer to, or play up, recreational substance use – be that marijuana, alcohol or even nicotine in the argument for using marijuana for medical conditions. Being less harmful, does not make it effective.

So, does that mean I don’t think marijuana is useful?

No. I DO think it will have a place in therapy. 

Based on what we know at present it may be useful as a mild to moderate pain reliever (when used in combination with other medications), there is also some early pre-clinical data on its use in combination with chemotherapy in cancer, though pre-clinical data does not mean it will work clinically in patients.  But by far the most interesting research and the greatest hope is on its use in neurological conditions.  Data on reducing the frequency of seizures in refractory epilepsy is compelling and improvements in spasticity in multiple sclerosis are promising.

My hope is that we can address the gaps in health professional’s education so that we increase their confidence in using marijuana appropriately, so that those who may benefit from its use, can do so. chemo@home is committed to helping both consumers and health professionals find the information they need.  Our website now has relevant information on access, supply and evidence on use, which we will continue to add to.  There is also a form for health professionals to upload case studies on the use of marijuana in their patients, so we can all learn from the experience.  If you have feed-back on what you want included or ways to improve the information provided, please leave a comment.

Addit:  You will notice I have not used the popular term, medicinal marijuana. Since we do not say medicinal penicillin or medicinal codeine, I do not think it is necessary here either.  I have also used the term marijuana for simplicity, and not the more “pharmaceutically correct” terms cannabinoids, cannabidiol (CBD) or tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).



Popular posts from this blog

How to End a Relationship by Not Eating Grapes

I don't much like shopping.  Not for food, clothes, homewares, furniture, cars or houses. But give me a cause, a reason to think more deeply and then I become a passionate shopper.  The ultimate conscious consumer.
Being a conscious consumer is defined as having an increased awareness of the impact of purchasing decisions on the environment and on health and life in general.
It is of course a double-edged sword. No decision can be made on the spur of the moment, far too much thought needs to go into every purchase.  The joy, however, from having purchased an item that attains the level of accountability I demand is immense.
It started years ago with "buy Australian". Something which has turned into Australian made, Australian owned, Australian produce... oh and even if it is Australian I want it as local as possible.
I support brands, the ones that disappear one by one on our duopolies shelves, who look after the environment, who understand their supply chain.
Carbon neutral,…

In whose best interests?

Recent media reports have highlighted the somewhat complex and hidden costs associated with health care.The Four Corners report “Mind the Gap” focused on out-of-pocket expenses and hidden fees from surgeons.Whilst the ABC medical report on “Secret Pacemaker Payments Boosting Private Hospital Coffers” focused on the hidden rebates hospitals receive for using various medical devices.
The two issues are separate, but very much related.  Both point to the lack of transparency of financial interactions between specialists, hospitals and a variety of other stakeholders in the health care market.

The first media report highlighted the issue around “informed financial consent”.It is mandatory for all patients receiving care from a specialist in a private hospital to sign a document stating that they agree to the charges related to the procedure or care for which they are being admitted.But how “informed” is the financial consent?At a vulnerable time, how likely is a patient to shop around to ge…

When healthcare is NOT about the patient.......

Have you ever believed in something, something you thought everyone else believed in as well; only to find out that in fact nothing could be further from the truth?
Just after we started chemo@home 5 years ago, a very high up health executive said to us during a meeting, "It's not about the patients, don't bring emotion into this".  It was possibly the first time (but definitely not the last time) that such a jaw dropping statement like this was said to us.
We had started chemo@home on the entire principle that treatment WAS ALL ABOUT THE PATIENT.  For us, the patient and their family are at the centre of everything we do.  Their choices, about their treatment, is what matters most.
To find out that there were health managers and executives who put other concerns before the patient was, for us, mind blowing.  What are these concerns you might ask.... well let’s just say that a lot of emphasis is placed on a health services "activity", the number of staff they …